20121019 Upholding Singapore Justice
This article is not about whether justice is just, and judgement is upheld.
It is about the basic principles - whether anyone can go into a court and interrupt its proceeding!
This has to be addressed and seen to be addressed with might and clarity.
Otherwise anyone can go into the court, parliament and make a circus out of all of them.
This has not happened even in Animal Farms governed by Pigs!
The creativity by one member of Law fraternity not only disrupted a court proceeding, sent scholars overseas, i met, dropped their jaws.
This event could not have happened if all responsible parties did responsibly, promptly.
Now it is for the Chief Justice, Law Minister, Home Affair Minister to act on
1. How anyone can interrupt the proceeding of a court?
2. Why the sitting judge, clerks, officers, security did no action in stopping this interruption?
3. Why the Chief Justice, relevant Ministers, Police did no action after this interruption?
4. What is the nature, intents of this interruption?
5. In whose interest this interruption served?
6. Is there or is there not connection between interested parties and the actors?
7. As this is not a civil nor criminal case, but one concerning the constitutions - the consideration and corrective action must they not be much higher? Must they not b
8. Would the President's opinion, advice and decision be published, necessarily published?
9. Is this the outcome of "teaching Lawyers to be creative" by the dean of law?
10. Under this situation, must or must not Prime Minister act on the purpose of law education, who to head Law Education in Universities?
Professor Simon Chesterman - "NUS needs to ensure that its graduates are not just good technical lawyers but are also creative thinkers and have the soft skills to work with people from different backgrounds"